NTS ABSTRACTSpring2024: Difference between revisions

From UW-Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 153: Line 153:
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE"  |  
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE"  |  
The Ceresa cycle is an algebraic 1-cycle in the Jacobian of a smooth algebraic curve with a chosen base point. It is algebraically trivial for a hyperelliptic curve and non-trivial for a very general complex curve of genus at least 3. Given a pointed algebraic curve, there is no general method to determine whether the Ceresa cycle associated to it is rationally or algebraically trivial. In this talk, I will discuss some methods and tools to study this problem.
The Ceresa cycle is an algebraic 1-cycle in the Jacobian of a smooth algebraic curve with a chosen base point. It is algebraically trivial for a hyperelliptic curve and non-trivial for a very general complex curve of genus at least 3. Given a pointed algebraic curve, there is no general method to determine whether the Ceresa cycle associated to it is rationally or algebraically trivial. In this talk, I will discuss some methods and tools to study this problem.
|}                                                                       
</center>
<br>
== Apr 04 ==
<center>
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20"
|-
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" |  '''Frank Calegari'''
|-
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE"  align="center" | “everywhere unramified” objects in number theory and the cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$
|-
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE"  |
One theme in number theory is to study objects via their ramification: the discriminant of a number field, the conductor of an elliptic curve, the level of a modular form, and so on.
There is, however, some particular interest in understanding objects which are “everywhere unramified” — and also understanding when such objects don’t exist. Such non-existence results
are often the starting point for inductive arguments. For example, Minkowski’s theorem that there are no unramified extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$ can be used to prove the Kronecker-Weber theorem, and the vanishing
of a certain space of modular forms is the starting point for Wiles’ proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. In this talk, I will begin by describing many such vanishing results both in arithmetic and in the
theory of automorphic forms, and how they are related by the Langlands program (sometimes only conjecturally). Then I will descibe the construction of a new example of an automorphic form of level one
and “weight zero”.  This construction also gives the first non-zero classes in the cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$ (for some $n$) that come from “cuspidal” modular forms (for $n > 0$).


|}                                                                         
|}                                                                         

Revision as of 18:34, 29 March 2024

Back to the number theory seminar main webpage: Main page

Jan 25

Jason Kountouridis
The monodromy of simple surface singularities in mixed characteristic

Given a smooth proper surface X over a $p$-adic field, it is a generally open problem in arithmetic geometry to relate the mod $p$ reduction of X with the monodromy action of inertia on the $\ell$-adic cohomology of X, the latter viewed as a Galois representation ($\ell \neq p$). In this talk, I will focus on the case of X degenerating to a surface with simple singularities, also known as rational double points. This class of singularities is linked to simple simply-laced Lie algebras, and in turn this allows for a concrete description of the associated local monodromy. Along the way we will see how Springer theory enters the picture, and we will discuss a mixed-characteristic version of some classical results of Artin, Brieskorn and Slodowy on simultaneous resolutions.


Feb 01

Brian Lawrence
Conditional algorithmic Mordell

Conditionally on the Fontaine-Mazur, Hodge, and Tate conjectures, there is an algorithm that finds all rational points on any curve of genus at least 2 over a number field. The algorithm uses Faltings's original proof of the finiteness of rational points, along with an analytic bound on the degree of an isogeny due to Masser and Wüstholz. (Work in progress with Levent Alpoge.)


Feb 08

Haoyang Guo
Frobenius height of cohomology in mixed characteristic geometry

In complex geometry, it is known that the i-th cohomology of a variation of Hodge structures on a smooth projective complex variety has the weight increased by at most i. In this talk, we consider the mixed and the positive characteristic analogues of this fact. We recall the notion of prismatic cohomology and prismatic crystals introduced by Bhatt and Scholze, and show that Frobenius height of the i-th prismatic cohomology of a prismatic F-crystal behaves the same. This is a joint work with Shizhang Li.


Feb 15

Sachi Hashimoto
p-adic Gross--Zagier and rational points on modular curves

Faltings' theorem states that there are finitely many rational points on a nice projective curve defined over the rationals of genus at least 2. The quadratic Chabauty method makes explicit some cases of Faltings' theorem. Quadratic Chabauty has recent notable success in determining the rational points of some modular curves. In this talk, I will explain how we can leverage information from p-adic Gross--Zagier formulas to give a new quadratic Chabauty method for certain modular curves. Gross--Zagier formulas relate analytic quantities (special values of p-adic L-functions) to invariants of algebraic cycles (the p-adic height and logarithm of Heegner points). By using p-adic Gross--Zagier formulas, this new quadratic Chabauty method makes essential use of modular forms to determine rational points.


Feb 22

Zhiyu Zhang
Asai L-functions and twisted arithmetic fundamental lemmas

Asai L-functions for GLn are related to the arithmetic of Asai motives. The twisted Gan—Gross—Prasad conjecture opens a way of studying (a twist of) central Asai L-values via descents and period integrals. I will consider an arithmetic analog of the conjecture on central derivatives. I will formulate and prove a twisted arithmetic fundamental lemma. The proof is based on new mirabolic special cycles on Rapoport—Zink spaces, and globalization via Kudla—Rapoport cycles and new twisted Hecke cycles on unitary Shimura varieties.

This talk is given online. Meeting ID: 930 1493 4562 Passcode: 1814


Feb 29

Andreas Mihatsch
Generating series of complex multiplication points

A classical result of Zagier states that the degrees of Heegner divisors on the modular curve form the positive Fourier coefficients of a modular form. In my talk, I will define complex multiplication cycles on the Siegel modular variety and show that their degrees have a similar modularity property. This is joint work with Lucas Gerth.



March 7

Baying Liu
Recent progress on certain problems related to local Arthur packets of classical groups

In this talk, I will introduce recent progress on certain problems related to local Arthur packets of classical groups. First, I will introduce a joint work with Freydoon Shahidi towards Jiang's conjecture on the wave front sets of representations in local Arthur packets of classical groups, which is a natural generalization of Shahidi's conjecture, confirming the relation between the structure of wave front sets and the local Arthur parameters. Then, I will introduce a joint work with Alexander Hazeltine and Chi-Heng Lo on the intersection problem of local Arthur packets for symplectic and split odd special orthogonal groups, with applications to the Enhanced Shahidi's conjecture, the closure relation conjecture, and the conjectures of Clozel on unramified representations and automorphic representations. This intersection problem also has been worked out independently at the same time by Hiraku Atobe. In a recent joint work with Alexander Hazeltine, Chi-Heng Lo, and Freydoon Shahidi, we made an upper bound conjecture on wavefront sets of admissible representations of connected reductive groups. If time permits, I will also introduce our recent progress towards this conjecture and its connection with Jiang's conjecture.


Mar 14

Peter Humphries
Restricted Arithmetic Quantum Unique Ergodicity

The quantum unique ergodicity conjecture of Rudnick and Sarnak concerns the mass equidistribution in the large eigenvalue limit of Laplacian eigenfunctions on negatively curved manifolds. This conjecture has been resolved by Lindenstrauss when this manifold is the modular surface assuming these eigenfunctions are additionally Hecke eigenfunctions, namely Hecke-Maass cusp forms. I will discuss a variant of this problem in this arithmetic setting concerning the mass equidistribution of Hecke-Maass cusp forms on submanifolds of the modular surface, along with connections to period integrals of automorphic forms.


Mar 21

Wanlin Li
The nontriviality of the Ceresa cycle

The Ceresa cycle is an algebraic 1-cycle in the Jacobian of a smooth algebraic curve with a chosen base point. It is algebraically trivial for a hyperelliptic curve and non-trivial for a very general complex curve of genus at least 3. Given a pointed algebraic curve, there is no general method to determine whether the Ceresa cycle associated to it is rationally or algebraically trivial. In this talk, I will discuss some methods and tools to study this problem.


Apr 04

Frank Calegari
“everywhere unramified” objects in number theory and the cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$

One theme in number theory is to study objects via their ramification: the discriminant of a number field, the conductor of an elliptic curve, the level of a modular form, and so on. There is, however, some particular interest in understanding objects which are “everywhere unramified” — and also understanding when such objects don’t exist. Such non-existence results are often the starting point for inductive arguments. For example, Minkowski’s theorem that there are no unramified extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$ can be used to prove the Kronecker-Weber theorem, and the vanishing of a certain space of modular forms is the starting point for Wiles’ proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. In this talk, I will begin by describing many such vanishing results both in arithmetic and in the theory of automorphic forms, and how they are related by the Langlands program (sometimes only conjecturally). Then I will descibe the construction of a new example of an automorphic form of level one and “weight zero”. This construction also gives the first non-zero classes in the cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$ (for some $n$) that come from “cuspidal” modular forms (for $n > 0$).