AG-Week Five: Difference between revisions

From UW-Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
== Questions ==
== Questions ==
* Cohen-Macaulay rings, and dimensions.
* Cohen-Macaulay rings, and dimensions.
* What kinds of topological spaces can be Spec of a ring?
* What kinds of topological properties of Spec R translate "reasonably" to properties of R?  (E.g., Spec R being disconnected implies R is a direct product of two rings.)


== Comments ==
== Comments ==
Localization notation is confusing.  Be very careful about the difference between localizing at an element, and localizing "at" a prime ideal.  (The latter really means localizing at the multiplicative system of all elements not in the prime ideal.)
* Localization notation is confusing.  Be very careful about the difference between localizing at an element, and localizing "at" a prime ideal.  (The latter really means localizing at the multiplicative system of all elements not in the prime ideal.)


== Typos ==
== Typos ==


[[Category:Fall 2010 Algebraic Geometry Reading Course]]
[[Category:Fall 2010 Algebraic Geometry Reading Course]]

Latest revision as of 19:03, 1 October 2010

Week Five

This is the page with specific information for Week 5 of our Algebraic Geometry Graduate Reading Course. This week we will be finishing up sheaves and start our official introduction to schemes.

Discussion Leader: Evan

Schedule

Week five

  • For 9/29: Read sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the notes.
  • For 10/1: Read sections 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5 of the notes.
  • For 10/4: Breather / discuss previous material.
    • Meeting with faculty.

Homework

Six problems are due on 9/29.

Questions

  • Cohen-Macaulay rings, and dimensions.
  • What kinds of topological spaces can be Spec of a ring?
  • What kinds of topological properties of Spec R translate "reasonably" to properties of R? (E.g., Spec R being disconnected implies R is a direct product of two rings.)

Comments

  • Localization notation is confusing. Be very careful about the difference between localizing at an element, and localizing "at" a prime ideal. (The latter really means localizing at the multiplicative system of all elements not in the prime ideal.)

Typos