NTS ABSTRACTFall2019: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Shusterman (talk | contribs) (→Sep 5) |
Shusterman (talk | contribs) (→Sep 5) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Will Sawin''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Will Sawin''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | The sup-norm problem for automorphic forms over function fields | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | The sup-norm problem for automorphic forms over function fields and geometry | ||
and geometry | |||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | The sup-norm problem is a purely analytic question about | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
The sup-norm problem is a purely analytic question about | |||
automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when | automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when | ||
viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe | viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 19 August 2019
Return to [1]
Sep 5
| Will Sawin |
| The sup-norm problem for automorphic forms over function fields and geometry |
|
The sup-norm problem is a purely analytic question about automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe a new approach to this problem in the function field setting, which we carry through to provide new bounds for forms in GL_2 stronger than what can be proved for the analogous question about classical modular forms. This approach proceeds by viewing the automorphic form as a geometric object, following Drinfeld. It should be possible to prove bounds in greater generality by this approach in the future. |