# Difference between revisions of "Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2014"

Line 62: | Line 62: | ||

TBA | TBA | ||

− | ===Lars W Christensen== | + | ===Lars W Christensen=== |

Tate (co)homology was originally defined for modules over | Tate (co)homology was originally defined for modules over | ||

group algebras. The cohomological theory has a very satisfactory | group algebras. The cohomological theory has a very satisfactory |

## Revision as of 21:38, 1 October 2014

The seminar meets on Fridays at 2:25 pm in Van Vleck B131.

The schedule for the previous semester is here.

## Algebraic Geometry Mailing List

- Please join the Algebraic Geometry Mailing list to hear about upcoming seminars, lunches, and other algebraic geometry events in the department (it is possible you must be on a math department computer to use this link).

## Fall 2014 Schedule

date | speaker | title | host(s) |
---|---|---|---|

September 12 | Andrei Caldararu (UW) | Geometric and algebraic significance of the Bridgeland differential | (local) |

September 19 | Greg G. Smith (Queen's University) | Toric vector bundles | (Daniel) |

October 3 | Daniel Erman (UW) | Tate resolutions for products of projective spaces | (local) |

October 10 | Lars Winther Christensen (Texas Tech University) | Beyond Tate (co)homology | Daniel |

October 17 | Claudiu Raicu (Notre Dame University) | TBA | Daniel |

November 21 | Eyal Markman (UMass Amherst) | TBA | Andrei |

December 5 | DJ Bruce (UW) | TBA | local |

## Abstracts

### Andrei Caldararu

Several years ago Tom Bridgeland suggested that there should exist interesting chain maps C_*(M_{g,n}) -> C_{*+2}(M_{g,n+1}) and he conjectured some applications of these maps to mirror symmetry. I shall present a precise definition of these maps using techniques from the theory of ribbon graphs, and discuss a recent result (joint with Dima Arinkin) about the homology of the total complex associated to the bicomplex obtained from these maps. Then I shall speculate (wildly) about applications to mirror symmetry.

### Eyal Markman

TBA

### Lars W Christensen

Tate (co)homology was originally defined for modules over group algebras. The cohomological theory has a very satisfactory generalization---Tate--Vogel cohomology or stable cohomology---to the setting of associative rings. The properties of the corresponding generalization of the homological theory are, perhaps, less straightforward and have, in any event, been poorly understood. I will report on recent progress in this direction. The talk is based on joint work with Olgur Celikbas, Li Liang, and Grep Piepmeyer.