Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2016: Difference between revisions

From UW-Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
|October 14
|October 14
|[http://www.auburn.edu/~lao0004/ Luke Oeding] (Auburn)
|[http://www.auburn.edu/~lao0004/ Luke Oeding] (Auburn)
|[[#Luke Oeding|TBA]]
|[[#Luke Oeding|Border ranks of monomials]]
|Steven
|Steven
|
|
Line 89: Line 89:


===Luke Oeding===
===Luke Oeding===
TBA
''Border ranks of monomials''
 
What is the minimal number of terms needed to write a monomial as a sum of powers? What if you allow limits?
Here are some minimal examples:
 
<math>4xy = (x+y)^2 - (x-y)^2</math>
 
<math>24xyz = (x+y+z)^3 + (x-y-z)^3 + (-x-y+z)^3 + (-x+y-z)^3</math>
 
<math>192xyzw = (x+y+z+w)^4 - (-x+y+z+w)^4 - (x-y+z+w)^4 - (x+y-z+w)^4 - (x+y+z-w)^4 + (-x-y+z+w)^4 + (-x+y-z+w)^4 + (-x+y+z-w)^4</math>
 
The monomial <math>x^2y</math> has a minimal expression as a sum of 3 cubes:
 
<math>6x^2y = (x+y)^3 + (-x+y)^3 -2y^3</math>
 
But you can use only 2 cubes if you allow a limit:
 
<math>6x^2y = lim_{\epsilon \to  0} \frac{(x^3 - (x-\epsilon y)^3)}{\epsilon}</math>
 
Can you do something similar with xyzw? Previously it wasn't known whether the minimal number of powers in a limiting expression for xyzw was 7 or 8. I will answer this and the analogous question for all monomials.
 
The polynomial Waring problem is to write a polynomial as linear combination of powers of linear forms in the minimal possible way. The minimal number of summands is called the rank of the polynomial. The solution in the case of monomials was given in 2012 by Carlini--Catalisano--Geramita, and independently shortly thereafter by Buczynska--Buczynski--Teitler. In this talk I will address the problem of finding the border rank of each monomial.
 
Upper bounds on border rank were known since Landsberg-Teitler, 2010 and earlier. We use symmetry-enhanced linear algebra to provide polynomial certificates of lower bounds (which agree with the upper bounds).
This work builds on the idea of Young flattenings, which were introduced by Landsberg and Ottaviani, and give determinantal equations for secant varieties and provide lower bounds for border ranks of tensors.  We find special monomial-optimal Young flattenings that provide the best possible lower bound for all monomials up to degree 6. For degree 7 and higher these flattenings no longer suffice for all monomials. To overcome this problem, we introduce partial Young flattenings and use them to give a lower bound on the border rank of monomials which agrees with Landsberg and Teitler's upper bound. I will also show how to implement Young flattenings and partial Young flattenings in Macaulay2 using Steven Sam's PieriMaps package.

Revision as of 18:16, 20 September 2016

The seminar meets on Fridays at 2:25 pm in Van Vleck B305.

Here is the schedule for the previous semester.

Algebraic Geometry Mailing List

  • Please join the AGS Mailing List to hear about upcoming seminars, lunches, and other algebraic geometry events in the department (it is possible you must be on a math department computer to use this link).

Fall 2016 Schedule

date speaker title host(s)
September 16 Alexander Pavlov (Wisconsin) Betti Tables of MCM Modules over the Cones of Plane Cubics local
September 23 PhilSang Yoo (Northwestern) Classical Field Theories for Quantum Geometric Langlands Dima
October 7 Botong Wang (Wisconsin) TBA local
October 14 Luke Oeding (Auburn) Border ranks of monomials Steven
October 28 Adam Boocher (Utah) TBA Daniel
November 4 Reserved TBA Daniel
November 11 Daniel Litt (Columbia) TBA Jordan
November 18 David Stapleton (Stony Brook) TBA Daniel
December 2 Rohini Ramadas (Michigan) TBA Daniel and Jordan

Abstracts

Alexander Pavlov

Betti Tables of MCM Modules over the Cones of Plane Cubics

Graded Betti numbers are classical invariants of finitely generated modules over graded rings describing the shape of a minimal free resolution. We show that for maximal Cohen-Macaulay (MCM) modules over a homogeneous coordinate rings of smooth Calabi-Yau varieties X computation of Betti numbers can be reduced to computations of dimensions of certain Hom groups in the bounded derived category D(X). In the simplest case of a smooth elliptic curve embedded into projective plane as a cubic we use our formula to get explicit answers for Betti numbers. In this case we show that there are only four possible shapes of the Betti tables up to a shifts in internal degree, and two possible shapes up to a shift in internal degree and taking syzygies.


PhilSang Yoo

Classical Field Theories for Quantum Geometric Langlands

One can study a class of classical field theories in a purely algebraic manner, thanks to the recent development of derived symplectic geometry. After reviewing the basics of derived symplectic geometry, I will discuss some interesting examples of classical field theories, including B-model, Chern-Simons theory, and Kapustin-Witten theory. Time permitting, I will make a proposal to understand quantum geometric Langlands and other related Langlands dualities in a unified way from the perspective of field theory.

Botong Wang

TBA

Luke Oeding

Border ranks of monomials

What is the minimal number of terms needed to write a monomial as a sum of powers? What if you allow limits? Here are some minimal examples:

[math]\displaystyle{ 4xy = (x+y)^2 - (x-y)^2 }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ 24xyz = (x+y+z)^3 + (x-y-z)^3 + (-x-y+z)^3 + (-x+y-z)^3 }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ 192xyzw = (x+y+z+w)^4 - (-x+y+z+w)^4 - (x-y+z+w)^4 - (x+y-z+w)^4 - (x+y+z-w)^4 + (-x-y+z+w)^4 + (-x+y-z+w)^4 + (-x+y+z-w)^4 }[/math]

The monomial [math]\displaystyle{ x^2y }[/math] has a minimal expression as a sum of 3 cubes:

[math]\displaystyle{ 6x^2y = (x+y)^3 + (-x+y)^3 -2y^3 }[/math]

But you can use only 2 cubes if you allow a limit:

[math]\displaystyle{ 6x^2y = lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{(x^3 - (x-\epsilon y)^3)}{\epsilon} }[/math]

Can you do something similar with xyzw? Previously it wasn't known whether the minimal number of powers in a limiting expression for xyzw was 7 or 8. I will answer this and the analogous question for all monomials.

The polynomial Waring problem is to write a polynomial as linear combination of powers of linear forms in the minimal possible way. The minimal number of summands is called the rank of the polynomial. The solution in the case of monomials was given in 2012 by Carlini--Catalisano--Geramita, and independently shortly thereafter by Buczynska--Buczynski--Teitler. In this talk I will address the problem of finding the border rank of each monomial.

Upper bounds on border rank were known since Landsberg-Teitler, 2010 and earlier. We use symmetry-enhanced linear algebra to provide polynomial certificates of lower bounds (which agree with the upper bounds). This work builds on the idea of Young flattenings, which were introduced by Landsberg and Ottaviani, and give determinantal equations for secant varieties and provide lower bounds for border ranks of tensors. We find special monomial-optimal Young flattenings that provide the best possible lower bound for all monomials up to degree 6. For degree 7 and higher these flattenings no longer suffice for all monomials. To overcome this problem, we introduce partial Young flattenings and use them to give a lower bound on the border rank of monomials which agrees with Landsberg and Teitler's upper bound. I will also show how to implement Young flattenings and partial Young flattenings in Macaulay2 using Steven Sam's PieriMaps package.