Algebraic Geometry Seminar Spring 2012: Difference between revisions
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
Abstract: Let X be a variety equipped with a G-action and G-invariant regular function, w. The GIT quotient X//G depends on the additional data of a G-linearized line bundle. As one varies the G-linearized line bundle, X//G changes in a very controlled manner. We will discuss how the category of matrix factorizations, mf(X//G,w), changes as the G-linearized line bundle varies. We will focus on the case where G is toroidal. In this case, we show that, as one travels through a wall in the GIT cone, semi-orthogonal components coming from the wall are either added or subtracted. | Abstract: Let X be a variety equipped with a G-action and G-invariant regular function, w. The GIT quotient X//G depends on the additional data of a G-linearized line bundle. As one varies the G-linearized line bundle, X//G changes in a very controlled manner. We will discuss how the category of matrix factorizations, mf(X//G,w), changes as the G-linearized line bundle varies. We will focus on the case where G is toroidal. In this case, we show that, as one travels through a wall in the GIT cone, semi-orthogonal components coming from the wall are either added or subtracted. | ||
===Arend Bayer=== | |||
''Projectivity and birational geometry of Bridgeland moduli spaces '' | |||
I will present a construction of a nef divisor for every moduli space of | |||
Bridgeland stable complexes on an algebraic variety. In the case of K3 | |||
surfaces, we can use it to prove projectivity of the moduli space, | |||
generalizing a result of Minamide, Yanagida and Yoshioka. It's | |||
dependence on the stability condition gives a systematic explanation for | |||
the compatibility of wall-crossing of the moduli space with its | |||
birational transformations; this had first been observed in examples by | |||
Arcara-Bertram. This is based on joint work with Emanuele Macrì. | |||
===Laurentiu Maxim=== | ===Laurentiu Maxim=== |
Revision as of 16:24, 8 February 2012
The seminar meets on Fridays at 2:25 pm in Van Vleck B215.
The schedule for the previous semester is here.
Spring 2012
date | speaker | title | host(s) |
---|---|---|---|
January 27 | Sukhendu Mehrotra (Madison) | Generalized deformations of K3 surfaces | (local) |
February 3 | Travis Schedler (MIT) | Symplectic resolutions and Poisson-de Rham homology | Andrei |
February 10 | Matthew Ballard (UW-Madison) | Variation of GIT for gauged Landau-Ginzburg models | (local) |
February 17 | Arend Bayer (UConn) | TBD | Andrei |
February 24 | Laurentiu Maxim (UW-Madison) | Characteristic classes of Hilbert schemes of points via symmetric products | local |
March 2 | Marti Lahoz (Bonn) | TBD | Sukhendu |
March 9 | Shilin Yu (Penn State) | TBD | Andrei |
March 16 | Weizhe Zheng (Columbia) | TBD | Tonghai |
March 23 | Ryan Grady (Notre Dame) | Twisted differential operators as observables in QFT. | Andrei |
April 27 | Ursula Whitcher (UW-Eau Claire) | TBA | Matt |
May 4 | Mark Andrea de Cataldo (Stony Brook) | TBA | Laurentiu |
Abstracts
Sukhendu Mehrotra
Generalized deformations of K3 surfaces
Travis Schedler
Symplectic resolutions and Poisson-de Rham homology
Abstract: A symplectic resolution is a resolution of singularities of a singular variety by a symplectic algebraic variety. Examples include symmetric powers of Kleinian (or du Val) singularities, resolved by Hilbert schemes of the minimal resolutions of Kleinian singularities, and the Springer resolution of the nilpotent cone of semisimple Lie algebras. Based on joint work with P. Etingof, I define a new homology theory on the singular variety, called Poisson-de Rham homology, which conjecturally coincides with the de Rham cohomology of the symplectic resolution. Its definition is based on "derived solutions" of Hamiltonian flow, using the algebraic theory of D-modules. I will give applications to the representation theory of noncommutative deformations of the algebra of functions of the singular variety. In the examples above, these are the spherical symplectic reflection algebras and finite W-algebras (modulo their center).
Matthew Ballard
Variation of GIT for gauged Landau-Ginzburg models
Abstract: Let X be a variety equipped with a G-action and G-invariant regular function, w. The GIT quotient X//G depends on the additional data of a G-linearized line bundle. As one varies the G-linearized line bundle, X//G changes in a very controlled manner. We will discuss how the category of matrix factorizations, mf(X//G,w), changes as the G-linearized line bundle varies. We will focus on the case where G is toroidal. In this case, we show that, as one travels through a wall in the GIT cone, semi-orthogonal components coming from the wall are either added or subtracted.
Arend Bayer
Projectivity and birational geometry of Bridgeland moduli spaces
I will present a construction of a nef divisor for every moduli space of Bridgeland stable complexes on an algebraic variety. In the case of K3 surfaces, we can use it to prove projectivity of the moduli space, generalizing a result of Minamide, Yanagida and Yoshioka. It's dependence on the stability condition gives a systematic explanation for the compatibility of wall-crossing of the moduli space with its birational transformations; this had first been observed in examples by Arcara-Bertram. This is based on joint work with Emanuele Macrì.
Laurentiu Maxim
Characteristic classes of Hilbert schemes of points via symmetric products
I will explain a formula for the generating series of (the push-forward under the Hilbert-Chow morphism of) homology characteristic classes of the Hilbert schemes of points for a smooth quasi-projective variety of arbitrary pure dimension. The result is based on a geometric construction of a motivic exponentiation generalizing the notion of motivic power structure, as well as a formula for the generating series of homology characteristic classes of symmetric products.