Geometry and Topology Seminar 2019-2020: Difference between revisions
Line 295: | Line 295: | ||
===Matthew Kahle (Ohio)=== | ===Matthew Kahle (Ohio)=== | ||
''TBA'' | ''TBA'' | ||
===JingZhou Sun(Stony | ===JingZhou Sun(Stony Brook)=== | ||
"TBA" | "TBA" | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 3 January 2014
The Geometry and Topology seminar meets in room 901 of Van Vleck Hall on Fridays from 1:20pm - 2:10pm.
For more information, contact Richard Kent.
Fall 2013
date | speaker | title | host(s) |
---|---|---|---|
September 6 | |||
September 13, 10:00 AM in 901! | Alex Zupan (Texas) | Totally geodesic subgraphs of the pants graph | Kent |
September 20 | |||
September 27 | |||
October 4 | |||
October 11 | |||
October 18 | Jayadev Athreya (Illinois) | Gap Distributions and Homogeneous Dynamics | Kent |
October 25 | Joel Robbin (Wisconsin) | GIT and [math]\displaystyle{ \mu }[/math]-GIT | local |
November 1 | Anton Lukyanenko (Illinois) | Uniformly quasi-regular mappings on sub-Riemannian manifolds | Dymarz |
November 8 | Neil Hoffman (Melbourne) | Verified computations for hyperbolic 3-manifolds | Kent |
November 15 | Khalid Bou-Rabee (Minnesota) | On generalizing a theorem of A. Borel | Kent |
November 22 | Morris Hirsch (Wisconsin) | Common zeros for Lie algebras of vector fields on real and complex | local |
Thanksgiving Recess | |||
December 6 | Sean Paul (Wisconsin) | (Semi)stable Pairs I | local |
December 13 | Sean Paul (Wisconsin) | (Semi)stable Pairs II | local |
Fall Abstracts
Alex Zupan (Texas)
Totally geodesic subgraphs of the pants graph
Abstract: For a compact surface S, the associated pants graph P(S) consists of vertices corresponding to pants decompositions of S and edges corresponding to elementary moves between pants decompositions. Motivated by the Weil-Petersson geometry of Teichmüller space, Aramayona, Parlier, and Shackleton conjecture that the full subgraph G of P(S) determined by fixing a multicurve is totally geodesic in P(S). We resolve this conjecture in the case that G is a product of Farey graphs. This is joint work with Sam Taylor.
Jayadev Athreya (Illinois)
Gap Distributions and Homogeneous Dynamics
Abstract: We discuss the notion of gap distributions of various lists of numbers in [0, 1], in particular focusing on those which are associated to certain low-dimensional dynamical systems. We show how to explicitly compute some examples using techniques of homogeneous dynamics, generalizing earlier work on gaps between Farey Fractions. This works gives some possible notions of `randomness' of special trajectories of billiards in polygons, and is based partly on joint works with J. Chaika, J. Chaika and S. Lelievre, and with Y.Cheung. This talk may also be of interest to number theorists.
Joel Robbin (Wisconsin)
GIT and [math]\displaystyle{ \mu }[/math]-GIT
Many problems in differential geometry can be reduced to solving a PDE of form
[math]\displaystyle{
\mu(x)=0
}[/math]
where [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] ranges over some function space and [math]\displaystyle{ \mu }[/math] is an infinite dimensional analog of the moment map in symplectic geometry.
In Hamiltonian dynamics the moment map was introduced to use a group action to reduce the number of degrees of freedom in the ODE.
It was soon discovered that the moment map could be applied to Geometric Invariant Theory:
if a compact Lie group [math]\displaystyle{ G }[/math] acts on a projective algebraic variety [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math],
then the complexification [math]\displaystyle{ G^c }[/math] also acts and there is an isomorphism of orbifolds
[math]\displaystyle{
X^s/G^c=X//G:=\mu^{-1}(0)/G
}[/math]
between the space of orbits of Mumford's stable points and the Marsden-Weinstein quotient.
In September of 2013 Dietmar Salamon, his student Valentina Georgoulas, and I wrote an exposition of (finite dimensional) GIT from the point of view of symplectic geometry. The theory works for compact Kaehler manifolds, not just projective varieties. I will describe our paper in this talk; the following Monday Dietmar will give more details in the Geometric Analysis Seminar.
Anton Lukyanenko (Illinois)
Uniformly quasi-regular mappings on sub-Riemannian manifolds
Abstract: A quasi-regular (QR) mapping between metric manifolds is a branched cover with bounded dilatation, e.g. f(z)=z^2. In a joint work with K. Fassler and K. Peltonen, we define QR mappings of sub-Riemannian manifolds and show that: 1) Every lens space admits a uniformly QR (UQR) mapping f. 2) Every UQR mapping leaves invariant a measurable conformal structure. The first result uses an explicit "conformal trap" construction, while the second builds on similar results by Sullivan-Tukia and a connection to higher-rank symmetric spaces.
Neil Hoffman (Melbourne)
Verified computations for hyperbolic 3-manifolds
Abstract: Given a triangulated 3-manifold M a natural question is: Does M admit a hyperbolic structure?
While this question can be answered in the negative if M is known to be reducible or toroidal, it is often difficult to establish a certificate of hyperbolicity, and so computer methods have developed for this purpose. In this talk, I will describe a new method to establish such a certificate via verified computation and compare the method to existing techniques.
This is joint work with Kazuhiro Ichihara, Masahide Kashiwagi, Hidetoshi Masai, Shin'ichi Oishi, and Akitoshi Takayasu.
Khalid Bou-Rabee (Minnesota)
On generalizing a theorem of A. Borel
The proof of the Hausdorff-Banach-Tarski paradox relies on the existence of a nonabelian free group in the group of rotations of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathbb{R}^3 }[/math]. To help generalize this paradox, Borel proved the following result on free groups.
Borel’s Theorem (1983): Let [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] be a free group of rank two. Let [math]\displaystyle{ G }[/math] be an arbitrary connected semisimple linear algebraic group (i.e., [math]\displaystyle{ G = \mathrm{SL}_n }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ n \geq 2 }[/math]). If [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma }[/math] is any nontrivial element in [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ V }[/math] is any proper subvariety of [math]\displaystyle{ G(\mathbb{C}) }[/math], then there exists a homomorphism [math]\displaystyle{ \phi: F \to G(\mathbb{C}) }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ \phi(\gamma) \notin V }[/math].
What is the class, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math], of groups that may play the role of [math]\displaystyle{ F }[/math] in Borel’s Theorem? Since the free group of rank two is in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math], it follows that all residually free groups are in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math]. In this talk, we present some methods for determining whether a finitely generated group is in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math]. Using these methods, we give a concrete example of a finitely generated group in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{L} }[/math] that is *not* residually free. After working out a few other examples, we end with a discussion on how this new theory provides an answer to a question of Brueillard, Green, Guralnick, and Tao concerning double word maps. This talk covers joint work with Michael Larsen.
Morris Hirsch (Wisconsin)
Common zeros for Lie algebras of vector fields on real and complex 2-manifolds.
The celebrated Poincare-Hopf theorem states that a vector ﬁeld [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] on a manifold [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] has nonempty zero set [math]\displaystyle{ Z(X) }[/math], provided [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] is compact with empty boundary and [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] has nonzero Euler characteristic. Surprising little is known about the set of common zeros of two or more vector ﬁelds, especially when [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] is not compact. One of the few results in this direction is a remarkable theorem of Christian Bonatti (Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat. 22 (1992), 215–247), stated below. When [math]\displaystyle{ Z(X) }[/math] is compact, [math]\displaystyle{ i(X) }[/math] denotes the intersection number of [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] with the zero section of the tangent bundle.
[math]\displaystyle{ \cdot }[/math] Assume [math]\displaystyle{ dim_{\mathbb{R}(M)} ≤ 4 }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is analytic, [math]\displaystyle{ Z(X) }[/math] is compact and [math]\displaystyle{ i(X) \neq 0 }[/math]. Then every analytic vector ﬁeld commuting with [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] has a zero in [math]\displaystyle{ Z(X) }[/math]. In this talk I will discuss the following analog of Bonatti’s theorem. Let [math]\displaystyle{ \mathfrak{g} }[/math] be a Lie algebra of analytic vector ﬁelds on a real or complex 2-manifold [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math], and set [math]\displaystyle{ Z(g) := \cap_{Y \in \mathfrak{g}} Z(Y) }[/math].
• Assume [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is analytic, [math]\displaystyle{ Z(X) }[/math] is compact and [math]\displaystyle{ i(X) \neq 0 }[/math]. Let [math]\displaystyle{ \mathfrak{g} }[/math] be generated by analytic vector ﬁelds [math]\displaystyle{ Y }[/math] on [math]\displaystyle{ M }[/math] such that the vectors [math]\displaystyle{ [X,Y]p }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ Xp }[/math] are linearly dependent at all [math]\displaystyle{ p \in M }[/math]. Then [math]\displaystyle{ Z(\mathfrak{g}) \cap Z(X) \neq \emptyset }[/math]. Related results on Lie group actions, and nonanalytic vector ﬁelds, will also be treated.
Sean Paul (Wisconsin)
(Semi)stable Pairs I
Sean Paul (Wisconsin)
(Semi)stable Pairs II
Spring 2014
date | speaker | title | host(s) |
---|---|---|---|
January 24 | |||
January 31 | |||
February 7 | |||
February 14 | |||
February 21 | |||
February 28 | |||
March 7 | |||
March 14 | |||
Spring Break | |||
March 28 | |||
April 4 | Matthew Kahle (Ohio) | TBA | Dymarz |
April 11 | |||
April 18 | |||
April 25 | |||
May 2 | |||
May 9 |
Spring Abstracts
Matthew Kahle (Ohio)
TBA
JingZhou Sun(Stony Brook)
"TBA"
Archive of past Geometry seminars
2012-2013: Geometry_and_Topology_Seminar_2012-2013
2011-2012: Geometry_and_Topology_Seminar_2011-2012
2010: Fall-2010-Geometry-Topology