NTS ABSTRACTFall2019: Difference between revisions
Shusterman (talk  contribs) No edit summary 
Shusterman (talk  contribs) (→Oct 10) 

Line 85:  Line 85:  
{ style="color:black; fontsize:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20"  { style="color:black; fontsize:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20"  
    
 bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="fontsize:125%"  '''   bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="fontsize:125%"  '''Borys Kadets'''  
    
 bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center"    bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center"  Sectional monodromy groups of projective curves  
    
 bgcolor="#BCD2EE"    bgcolor="#BCD2EE"   
Revision as of 19:18, 1 October 2019
Return to [1]
Sep 5
Will Sawin 
The supnorm problem for automorphic forms over function fields and geometry 
The supnorm problem is a purely analytic question about automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe a new approach to this problem in the function field setting, which we carry through to provide new bounds for forms in GL_2 stronger than what can be proved for the analogous question about classical modular forms. This approach proceeds by viewing the automorphic form as a geometric object, following Drinfeld. It should be possible to prove bounds in greater generality by this approach in the future. 
Sep 12
Yingkun Li 
CM values of modular functions and factorization 
The theory of complex multiplication tells us that the values of the jinvariant at CM points are algebraic integers. The norm of the difference of two such values has nice and explicit factorization, which was the subject of the seminal work of Gross and Zagier on singular moduli in the 1980s. In this talk, we will recall this classical result, review some recent factorization formula for other modular functions, and report some progress on a conjecture of Yui and Zagier. This is joint work with Tonghai Yang. 
Sep 19
Soumya Sankar 
Proportion of ordinary curves in some families 
An abelian variety in characteristic [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] is said to be ordinary if its [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] torsion is as large as possible. In 2012, Cais, Ellenberg and ZureickBrown made some conjectures about the distribution of the size of the [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math] torsion of an abelian variety. I will talk about some families which do not obey these heuristics, namely Jacobians of ArtinSchreier and superelliptic curves, and discuss the structure of the respective moduli spaces that make it so. 
Oct 3
Patrick Allen 
On the modularity of elliptic curves over imaginary quadratic fields 
Wiles's proof of the modularity of semistable elliptic curves over the rationals uses the LanglandsTunnell theorem as a starting point. In order to feed this into a modularity lifting theorem, one needs to use congruences between modular forms of weight one and modular forms of higher weight. Similar congruences are not known over imaginary quadratic fields and Wiles's strategy runs into problems right from the start. We circumvent this congruence problem and show that mod 3 Galois representations over imaginary quadratic fields arise from automorphic forms that are the analog of higher weight modular forms. Our argument relies on a 2adic automorphy lifting theorem over CM fields together with a "23 switch." As an application, we deduce that a positive proportion of elliptic curves over imaginary quadratic fields are modular. This is joint work in progress with Chandrashekhar Khare and Jack Thorne.

Oct 10
Borys Kadets 
Sectional monodromy groups of projective curves 
