Graduate Logic Seminar: Difference between revisions

From UW-Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Jgoh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m minor edit
 
(205 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Graduate Logic Seminar is an informal space where graduate students and professors present topics related to logic which are not necessarily original or completed work. This is a space focused principally on practicing presentation skills or learning materials that are not usually presented in a class.
The Graduate Logic Seminar is an informal space where graduate students and professors present topics related to logic which are not necessarily original or completed work. This is a space focused principally on practicing presentation skills or learning materials that are not usually presented in a class.


* '''When:''' Mondays 4p-5p (unless stated otherwise)
* '''When:''' Mondays 3:30-4:30 PM
* '''Where:''' on line (ask for code).
* '''Where:''' Van Vleck B211
* '''Organizers:''' [https://www.math.wisc.edu/~jgoh/ Jun Le Goh]
* '''Organizer:''' Joseph Miller


The talk schedule is arranged at the beginning of each semester. If you would like to participate, please contact one of the organizers.
The talk schedule is arranged at the beginning of each semester. If you would like to participate, please contact the organizers.


Sign up for the graduate logic seminar mailing list:  join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu
<!--Sign up for the graduate logic seminar mailing list:  [mailto:join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu]-->


== Fall 2020 - Tentative schedule ==
==Fall 2025==


=== September 14 - Josiah Jacobsen-Grocott ===
The seminar will be run as a 1-credit seminar Math 975. In Fall 2025 students will present a logic topic of their choice (it could be original work, but does not have to be).  If you are not enrolled but would like to audit it, please contact [mailto:jmiller@math.wisc.edu Joe Miller].


Title: Degrees of points in topological spaces
Presentation Schedule: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uRSaI1edJ5sepz57NV07ohIfBSKL9FgkvJvMAewk1ms/edit?usp=sharing Sign up here.]


Abstract: An overview of some results from Takayuki Kihara, Keng Meng Ng, and Arno Pauly in their paper Enumeration Degrees and Non-Metrizable Topology. We will look at a range of topological spaces and the corresponding classes in the enumeration degrees as well as ways in which we can distinguish the type of classes using the separation axioms.
<!--Zoom link for remote attendance: https://uwmadison.zoom.us/j/96168027763?pwd=bGdvL3lpOGl6QndQcG5RTFUzY3JXQT09 (Meeting ID: 961 6802 7763, Password: 975f23)-->


=== September 28 - James Hanson ===


Title: The Semilattice of Definable Sets in Continuous Logic
==='''September 8 - Organizational Meeting'''===


Abstract: After an analysis-free exposition of definable sets in continuous logic, we will present a fun, illustrated proof that any finite bounded lattice can be the poset of definable subsets of $S_1(T)$ for a continuous theory $T$.
We will meet to arrange the schedule


=== October 5 - Tejas Bhojraj from 3:30PM-4:00PM ===
==='''September 15 - Karthik Ravishankar: Contrasting the halves of an Ahmad pair'''  ===
Abstract: We study Ahmad pairs in the $\Sigma^0_2$ enumeration degrees. We say $(A,B)$ form an Ahmad pair if $A \not \leq_e B$ and every $Z <_e A$ satisfies $Z \leq_e B$.  Ahmad pairs have recently drawn interest as they are a key obstacle in solving the $\forall\exists$ theory of the local structure.


Title: A Levin-Schnorr type result for Weak Solovay random states.
In this talk we characterize the left halves of an Ahmad pair as precisely the low$_3$ and join irreducible degrees. We also show that right halves cannot be low$_3$. This is a natural separation between the two halves and is a significant strengthening of previous work.


Abstract: We look at the initial-segment complexity of Weak Solovay quantum random states using MK, a prefix-free version of quantum Kolmogorov complexity. The statement of our result is similar to the Levin-Schnorr theorem in classical algorithmic randomness.
We then define a hierarchy of join irreducibility notions using which we characterize the left halves of Ahmad $n$-pairs as those that are low$_3$ and $n$-join irreducible. This allows us to extend and clarify previous work to show that for any $n$ there is a set $A$ which is the left half of an Ahmad $n$-pair but not of an Ahmad $(n+1)$-pair.


=== November 9 - Karthik Ravishankar ===
=== '''September 22 - Dan Turetsky: An introduction to the method of true stages. Part 1.''' ===
Abstract: True stages are a method for organizing complex constructions in computability theory.  Over several lectures, I'll explain the method of true stages by working through some examples in computable structure theory.  We'll start with some necessary computability background.  Time permitting, I may discuss some of the applications of true stages to descriptive set theory.


Title: Elementary submodels in infinite combinatorics
=== '''September 29 - Dan Turetsky: An introduction to the method of true stages. Part 3.''' ===
Abstract: True stages are a method for organizing complex constructions in computability theory.  Over several lectures, I'll explain the method of true stages by working through some examples in computable structure theory.  We'll start with some necessary computability background.  Time permitting, I may discuss some of the applications of true stages to descriptive set theory.


Abstract: The usage of elementary submodels is a simple but powerful method to prove theorems, or to simplify proofs in infinite combinatorics. In the first part of the talk, we quickly cover the basic concepts involved for proving results using elementary submodels, and move on to provide two examples of application of the technique to prove two popular results from set theory: The Delta System lemma and the Fodors Pressing down lemma . We provide both the classical proof as well as a proof using elementary submodels to contrast the two approaches.
=== '''October 6 - Dhruv Kulshreshtha: Classification by countable structures''' ===
Abstract: Self-homeomorphisms of the interval [0,1] can be classified up to conjugacy by using certain countable structures as invariants. On the other hand, Hjorth showed that there is no definable way to classify self-homeomorphisms of the square [0,1]^2 in this manner.


=== November 16 - Karthik Ravishankar ===
In this talk, upon making these notions precise, we briefly discuss the machinery that is used to prove the aforementioned negative result. We then take a step towards studying the more general interplay between dimension and classifiability by arguing that homeomorphisms of the Sierpiński carpet, the one-dimensional universal plane curve, also cannot be classified in this manner. This result is based on joint work with Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos.


Title: Elementary submodels in infinite combinatorics, part II
=== '''October 13 - Chiara Travesset''' ===


Abstract: In the second part of the talk, we give a proof Fodors Pressing down lemma, along with an overview of the slightly larger proof of the Nash Williams theorem which states that a graph is decomposable as a disjoint union of cycles if and only if it has no odd cut.
==='''October 20 -''' ===


=== Tuesday, November 24 - Tonicha Crook (Swansea University) from 9:00AM-10:00AM ===
=== '''October 27 - Yiqing Wang''' ===


Title, abstract TBA
=== '''November 3 - Logan Heath''' ===


=== November 30 - Yvette Ren ===
==='''November 10 - Antonio Nakid Cordero'''  ===


Title, abstract TBA
==='''November 17 - Hongyu Zhu'''  ===


==Previous Years==
==='''November 24 - Taeyoung Em'''  ===
 
==='''December 1 - Lucas Duckworth'''  ===
 
==='''December 8 - John Spoerl'''  ===
 
== Previous Years==


The schedule of talks from past semesters can be found [[Graduate Logic Seminar, previous semesters|here]].
The schedule of talks from past semesters can be found [[Graduate Logic Seminar, previous semesters|here]].

Latest revision as of 19:04, 29 September 2025

The Graduate Logic Seminar is an informal space where graduate students and professors present topics related to logic which are not necessarily original or completed work. This is a space focused principally on practicing presentation skills or learning materials that are not usually presented in a class.

  • When: Mondays 3:30-4:30 PM
  • Where: Van Vleck B211
  • Organizer: Joseph Miller

The talk schedule is arranged at the beginning of each semester. If you would like to participate, please contact the organizers.


Fall 2025

The seminar will be run as a 1-credit seminar Math 975. In Fall 2025 students will present a logic topic of their choice (it could be original work, but does not have to be). If you are not enrolled but would like to audit it, please contact Joe Miller.

Presentation Schedule: Sign up here.


September 8 - Organizational Meeting

We will meet to arrange the schedule

September 15 - Karthik Ravishankar: Contrasting the halves of an Ahmad pair

Abstract: We study Ahmad pairs in the $\Sigma^0_2$ enumeration degrees. We say $(A,B)$ form an Ahmad pair if $A \not \leq_e B$ and every $Z <_e A$ satisfies $Z \leq_e B$.  Ahmad pairs have recently drawn interest as they are a key obstacle in solving the $\forall\exists$ theory of the local structure.

In this talk we characterize the left halves of an Ahmad pair as precisely the low$_3$ and join irreducible degrees. We also show that right halves cannot be low$_3$. This is a natural separation between the two halves and is a significant strengthening of previous work.

We then define a hierarchy of join irreducibility notions using which we characterize the left halves of Ahmad $n$-pairs as those that are low$_3$ and $n$-join irreducible. This allows us to extend and clarify previous work to show that for any $n$ there is a set $A$ which is the left half of an Ahmad $n$-pair but not of an Ahmad $(n+1)$-pair.

September 22 - Dan Turetsky: An introduction to the method of true stages. Part 1.

Abstract: True stages are a method for organizing complex constructions in computability theory.  Over several lectures, I'll explain the method of true stages by working through some examples in computable structure theory.  We'll start with some necessary computability background.  Time permitting, I may discuss some of the applications of true stages to descriptive set theory.

September 29 - Dan Turetsky: An introduction to the method of true stages. Part 3.

Abstract: True stages are a method for organizing complex constructions in computability theory.  Over several lectures, I'll explain the method of true stages by working through some examples in computable structure theory.  We'll start with some necessary computability background.  Time permitting, I may discuss some of the applications of true stages to descriptive set theory.

October 6 - Dhruv Kulshreshtha: Classification by countable structures

Abstract: Self-homeomorphisms of the interval [0,1] can be classified up to conjugacy by using certain countable structures as invariants. On the other hand, Hjorth showed that there is no definable way to classify self-homeomorphisms of the square [0,1]^2 in this manner.

In this talk, upon making these notions precise, we briefly discuss the machinery that is used to prove the aforementioned negative result. We then take a step towards studying the more general interplay between dimension and classifiability by arguing that homeomorphisms of the Sierpiński carpet, the one-dimensional universal plane curve, also cannot be classified in this manner. This result is based on joint work with Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos.

October 13 - Chiara Travesset

October 20 -

October 27 - Yiqing Wang

November 3 - Logan Heath

November 10 - Antonio Nakid Cordero

November 17 - Hongyu Zhu

November 24 - Taeyoung Em

December 1 - Lucas Duckworth

December 8 - John Spoerl

Previous Years

The schedule of talks from past semesters can be found here.