Graduate Logic Seminar: Difference between revisions

From UW-Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(110 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Graduate Logic Seminar is an informal space where graduate students and professors present topics related to logic which are not necessarily original or completed work. This is a space focused principally on practicing presentation skills or learning materials that are not usually presented in a class.
The Graduate Logic Seminar is an informal space where graduate students and professors present topics related to logic which are not necessarily original or completed work. This is a space focused principally on practicing presentation skills or learning materials that are not usually presented in a class.


* '''When:''' Tuesdays 4-5 PM
* '''When:''' Mondays 3:30-4:30 PM
* '''Where:''' Van Vleck 901
* '''Where:''' Van Vleck B223
* '''Organizers:''' [https://www.math.wisc.edu/~jgoh/ Jun Le Goh]
* '''Organizers:''' [https://people.math.wisc.edu/~slempp/ Steffen Lempp] and [https://sites.google.com/view/hongyu-zhu/ Hongyu Zhu]


The talk schedule is arranged at the beginning of each semester. If you would like to participate, please contact one of the organizers.
The talk schedule is arranged at the beginning of each semester. If you would like to participate, please contact one of the organizers.


Sign up for the graduate logic seminar mailing list:  join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu
Sign up for the graduate logic seminar mailing list:  [mailto:join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu]


== Spring 2022 ==
== Spring 2024 ==


The graduate logic seminar this semester will be run as MATH 975. Please enroll if you wish to participate.
The seminar will be run as a 1-credit seminar Math 975 . In Spring 2024, the topic will be forcing constructions in computability theory. If you are not enrolled but would like to audit it, please contact [https://people.math.wisc.edu/~slempp/ Steffen Lempp]  and [mailto:hongyu@math.wisc.edu Hongyu Zhu].


We plan to cover the first 9 parts of [https://blog.nus.edu.sg/matwong/teach/modelarith/ Tin Lok Wong's notes], as well as a few other relevant topics which are not covered in the notes:
Presentation Schedule: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JC6glG_soNLtaMQWaAuADlUu8dh2eJ0NL-MaUr7-nOk/edit?usp=sharing
* Properness of the induction/bounding hierarchy (chapter 10 of Models of Peano Arithmetic by Kaye is a good source)
* Tennenbaum's theorem (this is a quick consequence of the main theorem of part 4, so it should be combined with part 4 or part 5)
* Other facts found in chapter 1 of [http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~marker/marker-thesis.pdf David Marker's thesis].


=== January 25 - organizational meeting ===
Zoom link for remote attendance: https://uwmadison.zoom.us/j/96168027763?pwd=bGdvL3lpOGl6QndQcG5RTFUzY3JXQT09 (Meeting ID: 961 6802 7763, Password: 975f23)


We will meet to assign speakers to dates.
=== January 29 - Organizational Meeting ===


=== February 1 - Steffen Lempp ===
Steffen Lempp will give an overview and present some very basic forcing construction.


I will give an overview of the topics we will cover:  
We will then assign speakers to dates and topics.
1. the base theory PA^- and the induction and bounding axioms for Sigma_n-formulas, and how they relate to each other
 
2. the equivalence of Sigma_n-induction with a version of Sigma_n-separation (proved by H. Friedman)
=== '''February 5 - Taeyoung Em''' ===
3. the Grzegorczyk hierarchy of fast-growing functions,
'''Title:''' Introduction to forcing
4. end extensions and cofinal extensions,
 
5. recursive saturation and resplendency,
'''Abstract:''' We introduce new definitions and properties regarding forcing.  
6. standard systems and coded types,
 
7. the McDowell-Specker Theorem that every model of PA has a proper elementary end extension, and
=== '''February 12 - Hongyu Zhu''' ===
8. Giafman's theorem that every model of PA has a minimal elementary end extension.
'''Title:''' Slaman-Woodin Forcing and the Theory of Turing Degrees
I will sketch the basic definitions and state the main theorems, in a form that one can appreciate without too much background.
 
'''Abstract:''' We will discuss how to use Slaman-Woodin forcing to interpret true second(first, resp.)-order arithmetic in the Turing degrees (Turing degrees below 0', resp.), thereby showing they have the same Turing degree.
 
=== '''February 19 - John Spoerl''' ===
'''Title:''' Forcing with Trees - Spector's and Sack's Minimal Degrees
 
'''Abstract:''' We'll take a look at Spector's forcing which uses perfect trees as conditions.  Then we'll see where we might make some improvements which leads to Sack's sharpening of Spector's theorem: there is a minimal degree below 0'.
 
=== '''February 26 - Karthik Ravishankar''' ===
'''Title:''' The 3 element chain as an initial segment of the Turing Degrees
 
'''Abstract:''' In this talk, we'll look at the construction of a minimal degree with a strong minimal cover which shows that the three-element chain can be embedded as an initial segment of the Turing Degrees. The construction builds off ideas of Spector's minimal degree with stronger assumptions on the forcing conditions used. If time permits, we'll also talk about Copper's Jump Inversion building off Sack's construction.
 
=== '''March 4 - Karthik Ravishankar''' ===
'''Title:''' Bushy Tree forcing and constructing a minimal degree which is DNC
 
'''Abstract:''' We shall look at a forcing technique called Bushy Tree forcing using it to show that there is no uniform way to compute a DNC_2 from a DNC_3 function and that there is a DNC function that is weak in the sense that it does not compute a computably bounded DNC function. We present a few other results along these lines and sketch the construction of a minimal degree that is DNC relative to any given oracle using bushy tree forcing.
 
=== '''March 11 - Josiah Jacobsen-Grocott''' ===
'''Title:''' A uniformly e-pointed tree on Baire space without dead ends that is not of cototal degree
 
'''Abstract:''' A set is cototal if it is enumeration reducible to its complement. A tree is e-point if every path on the tree can enumerate the tree. McCathy proved that these notions are equivalent up to e-degree when considering e-pointed trees on cantor space. This fails when considering trees on Baire space. We give an example of a simple forcing construction that produces e-pointed trees on Baire space. We carefully analyze this forcing partial order to prove that generic e-pointed trees without dead ends are not of cototal degree.
 
=== '''March 18 - Alice Vidrine''' ===
'''Title:''' There is no non-computable bi-introreducible set
 
'''Abstract:''' A set is said to be bi-introreducible if it can be computed by any of its infinite subsets, or any infinite subset of its complement. This talk will detail a Matthias forcing construction used to prove a theorem by Seetapun which implies that the bi-introreducible sets are exactly the computable sets.
 
=== '''April 1 - Hongyu Zhu''' ===
'''Title:''' The Conservativeness of WKL_0 over RCA_0 for <math>\Pi_1^1</math>-formulas
 
'''Abstract:''' We will see how to use forcing to construct models of WKL_0 from models of RCA_0 while preserving certain arithmetical truths, thereby showing that WKL_0 is <math>\Pi_1^1</math>-conservative over RCA_0.
 
 
<!-- Template
 
=== '''September 18 - xxx''' ===
'''Title:''' TBA ([https://wiki.math.wisc.edu/images/***.pdf Slides])
 
'''Abstract:''' TBA
 
-->


== Previous Years ==
== Previous Years ==


The schedule of talks from past semesters can be found [[Graduate Logic Seminar, previous semesters|here]].
The schedule of talks from past semesters can be found [[Graduate Logic Seminar, previous semesters|here]].

Latest revision as of 22:43, 27 March 2024

The Graduate Logic Seminar is an informal space where graduate students and professors present topics related to logic which are not necessarily original or completed work. This is a space focused principally on practicing presentation skills or learning materials that are not usually presented in a class.

The talk schedule is arranged at the beginning of each semester. If you would like to participate, please contact one of the organizers.

Sign up for the graduate logic seminar mailing list: join-grad-logic-sem@lists.wisc.edu

Spring 2024

The seminar will be run as a 1-credit seminar Math 975 . In Spring 2024, the topic will be forcing constructions in computability theory. If you are not enrolled but would like to audit it, please contact Steffen Lempp and Hongyu Zhu.

Presentation Schedule: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JC6glG_soNLtaMQWaAuADlUu8dh2eJ0NL-MaUr7-nOk/edit?usp=sharing

Zoom link for remote attendance: https://uwmadison.zoom.us/j/96168027763?pwd=bGdvL3lpOGl6QndQcG5RTFUzY3JXQT09 (Meeting ID: 961 6802 7763, Password: 975f23)

January 29 - Organizational Meeting

Steffen Lempp will give an overview and present some very basic forcing construction.

We will then assign speakers to dates and topics.

February 5 - Taeyoung Em

Title: Introduction to forcing

Abstract: We introduce new definitions and properties regarding forcing.

February 12 - Hongyu Zhu

Title: Slaman-Woodin Forcing and the Theory of Turing Degrees

Abstract: We will discuss how to use Slaman-Woodin forcing to interpret true second(first, resp.)-order arithmetic in the Turing degrees (Turing degrees below 0', resp.), thereby showing they have the same Turing degree.

February 19 - John Spoerl

Title: Forcing with Trees - Spector's and Sack's Minimal Degrees

Abstract: We'll take a look at Spector's forcing which uses perfect trees as conditions. Then we'll see where we might make some improvements which leads to Sack's sharpening of Spector's theorem: there is a minimal degree below 0'.

February 26 - Karthik Ravishankar

Title: The 3 element chain as an initial segment of the Turing Degrees

Abstract: In this talk, we'll look at the construction of a minimal degree with a strong minimal cover which shows that the three-element chain can be embedded as an initial segment of the Turing Degrees. The construction builds off ideas of Spector's minimal degree with stronger assumptions on the forcing conditions used. If time permits, we'll also talk about Copper's Jump Inversion building off Sack's construction.

March 4 - Karthik Ravishankar

Title: Bushy Tree forcing and constructing a minimal degree which is DNC

Abstract: We shall look at a forcing technique called Bushy Tree forcing using it to show that there is no uniform way to compute a DNC_2 from a DNC_3 function and that there is a DNC function that is weak in the sense that it does not compute a computably bounded DNC function. We present a few other results along these lines and sketch the construction of a minimal degree that is DNC relative to any given oracle using bushy tree forcing.

March 11 - Josiah Jacobsen-Grocott

Title: A uniformly e-pointed tree on Baire space without dead ends that is not of cototal degree

Abstract: A set is cototal if it is enumeration reducible to its complement. A tree is e-point if every path on the tree can enumerate the tree. McCathy proved that these notions are equivalent up to e-degree when considering e-pointed trees on cantor space. This fails when considering trees on Baire space. We give an example of a simple forcing construction that produces e-pointed trees on Baire space. We carefully analyze this forcing partial order to prove that generic e-pointed trees without dead ends are not of cototal degree.

March 18 - Alice Vidrine

Title: There is no non-computable bi-introreducible set

Abstract: A set is said to be bi-introreducible if it can be computed by any of its infinite subsets, or any infinite subset of its complement. This talk will detail a Matthias forcing construction used to prove a theorem by Seetapun which implies that the bi-introreducible sets are exactly the computable sets.

April 1 - Hongyu Zhu

Title: The Conservativeness of WKL_0 over RCA_0 for [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi_1^1 }[/math]-formulas

Abstract: We will see how to use forcing to construct models of WKL_0 from models of RCA_0 while preserving certain arithmetical truths, thereby showing that WKL_0 is [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi_1^1 }[/math]-conservative over RCA_0.


Previous Years

The schedule of talks from past semesters can be found here.